For decades, there has been a deep rift between poetry and fiction in the United States, especially in academic settings; graduate writing programs in universities, for example, train students as poets or as writers of fiction, but almost never as both. Both poets and writers of fiction have tended to support this separation, in large part because the current conventional wisdom holds that poetry should be elliptical and lyrical, reflecting inner states and processes of thought or feeling, whereas character and narrative events are the stock-in-trade of fiction.
Certainly it is true that poetry and fiction are distinct genres, but why have specialized education and literary territoriality resulted from this distinction? The answer lies perhaps in a widespread attitude in U.S. culture, which often casts a suspicious eye on the generalist. Those with knowledge and expertise in multiple areas risk charges of dilettantism, as if ability in one field is diluted or compromised by accomplishment in another.
Fortunately, there are signs that the bias against writers who cross generic boundaries is diminishing; several recent writers are known and respected for their work in both genres. One important example of this trend is Rita Dove, an African American writer highly acclaimed for both her poetry and her fiction. A few years ago, speaking at a conference entitled “Poets Who Write Fiction,” Dove expressed gentle incredulity about the habit of segregating the genres. She had grown up reading and loving both fiction and poetry, she said, unaware of any purported danger lurking in attempts to mix the two. She also studied for some time in Germany, where, she observes, “Poets write plays, novelists compose libretti, playwrights write novels—they would not understand our restrictiveness.”
It makes little sense, Dove believes, to persist in the restrictive approach to poetry and fiction prevalent in the U.S., because each genre shares in the nature of the other. Indeed, her poetry offers example after example of what can only be properly regarded as lyric narrative. Her use of language in these poems is undeniably lyrical—that is, it evokes emotion and inner states without requiring the reader to organize ideas or events in a particular linear structure. Yet this lyric expression simultaneously presents the elements of a plot in such a way that the reader is led repeatedly to take account of clusters of narrative details within the lyric flow. Thus while the language is lyrical, it often comes to constitute, cumulatively, a work of narrative fiction.
Similarly, many passages in her fiction, though undeniably prose, achieve the status of lyric narrative through the use of poetic rhythms and elliptical expression. In short, Dove bridges the gap between poetry and fiction not only by writing in both genres, but also by fusing the two genres within individual works.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
(A) Rita Dove’s work has been widely acclaimed primarily because of the lyrical elements she has introduced into her fiction.
(B) Rita Dove’s lyric narratives present clusters of narrative detail in order to create a cumulative narrative without requiring the reader to interpret it in a linear manner.
(C) Working against a bias that has long been dominant in the U.S., recent writers like Rita Dove have shown that the lyrical use of language can effectively enhance narrative fiction.
(D) Unlike many of her U.S. contemporaries, Rita Dove writes without relying on the traditional techniques associated with poetry and fiction.
(E) Rita Dove’s successful blending of poetry and fiction exemplifies the recent trend away from the rigid separation of the two genres that has long been prevalent in the U.S.
A. The passage addresses trends in American poetry and prose broadly—not just Dove’s work. This answer focuses too narrowly on her. Plus, Dove is known for both her poetry and fiction, so it's misleading to single her out in this way.B. This focuses only on Dove’s poetry, ignoring her fiction. The passage uses Dove as an example of a broader movement away from rigidly separating poetry and prose, not just to highlight her poetic achievements.C. This is close but still too centered on Dove. Lines 21–25 make clear she’s part of a larger literary shift. Also, while lines 51–54 mention that her fiction gained recognition as “lyrical narrative,” they don’t directly state that lyrical language enhanced her fiction. If that were the author’s main point, it would have been discussed in more detail.D. Incorrect. Dove doesn’t stick to the traditional genre divide, but she does use traditional poetic rhythms and narrative forms. That means she isn’t rejecting those conventions entirely or opting for something radically experimental.E. Correct. The passage critiques the rigid separation between poetry and prose (paragraphs 1–2), and Dove serves as an example of a broader shift in literary practice (paragraphs 3–4, especially lines 21–25). The word “exemplifies” accurately reflects her role in illustrating this wider trend.