.jpg)
December 2, 2025, New York, NY — A new survey from Juris Education reveals that nearly two-thirds of aspiring lawyers use AI tools when preparing their law school applications, and three in four of those students choose ChatGPT as their preferred AI assistant.
A Juris Education survey of 248 pre-law students found that 62.5% of respondents used at least one AI tool during the application process. Of those, 73.4% turned to ChatGPT, far outpacing alternatives like Gemini (12%), Perplexity (5.2%), and Claude (3.6%).
The study was conducted by Juris Education, a law school admissions consulting firm, to understand how AI is reshaping the law school admissions process. The respondents answered anonymously through a Google Form.

The survey results show that AI has moved beyond the experimental stage for students and is now part of mainstream application prep.
Of the students who used AI, 63.3% said it improved the quality of their applications, with clearer writing and reduced stress as key benefits.
The study identified the following five main ways aspiring lawyers use AI in their applications:
Overall across U.S. campuses, AI adoption rates are soaring. A 2025 Inside Higher Ed report survey of over 1,000 U.S. college students found that 85% have used generative AI for coursework. Yet, institutional policies haven’t kept pace. Only 28% of colleges have formal AI guidelines, and another 32% are still developing them.
However, as adoption accelerates, attitudes are shifting in the legal field. While many educational institutions, once discouraged AI use, The University of Michigan Law School and the University of Miami School of Law recently became the first in the nation to introduce AI-based essay questions that require applicants to use tools like ChatGPT. These essays are designed to gauge AI literacy and ethical reasoning, a signal that, rather than cracking down on AI, schools may begin formally integrating it into their admissions process.
“Students are inevitably using AI to strengthen how they communicate and present ideas. Now that's visible in law school applications too,” said Arush Chandna, co-founder of Juris Education. “This can change how law schools evaluate originality, critical thinking, and ethical judgment in the admissions process. Some are, hence, looking at ways to integrate AI literacy into the process than treat it only as a disruptive force."
While most applicants use AI to enhance clarity and confidence, the findings raise questions about responsible use.
“AI has the capacity to serve as a valuable tool in the law school application process, as it can help many applicants uncover unexpected connections between their motivation for pursuing law school and their past personal / professional experiences,” said Jesse Wang, senior admissions consultant at Juris Education and an NY attorney. “However, the primary challenge lies in how AI is prompted and refined. Iteration is crucial, as students must learn to phrase follow-up questions carefully to avoid factual inaccuracies or “hallucinated” AI content.”
Students also must be cognizant of the specific policies of each law school.
Wang added, “It is equally essential that applicants comply with each law school’s specific policies regarding the use of AI tools. Maintaining compliance with those guidelines ensures the integrity of the application process, and I recommend applicants do their due diligence by researching those policies and asking admissions representatives questions if they are confused about them or require further guidance.”
Juris Education is a leading law school admissions consulting firm that helps students navigate every step of the application process. The firm’s team of former admissions officers and top law school graduates has over 15 years of experience and has helped students achieve a 98% acceptance rate across T14 and top-tier programs.

Get 7+ personal statement examples written by our succcessful applicants free of charge. No strings attached.